Copy linkCopied link
To effectively manage nature-related impacts, risks and performance, CLP utilises various environmental management tools and processes from a life cycle perspective to ensure that nature-related issues are considered at each stage of every project.
The following sections provide details of how CLP manages individual nature-related matters that are deemed material. CLP has developed goals and targets that go beyond regulatory compliance to drive continual improvement, and performance indicators that are monitoring the progress and effectiveness of its nature-related strategies, plans and programmes.
To strengthen the management of nature-related matters in the HSEMS, CLP carried out a review of relevant nature-related frameworks (including those aligned with the TNFD) and of its own nature-related practices.
At the project inception stage, CLP conducts a Pre-investment Environmental Risk Assessment (which includes EDD) to identify potential nature-related risks, liabilities and impacts of the project. The Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (IBAT) and the Climate Risk Assessment Tool are also used to respectively screen biodiversity-sensitive areas and identify potential climate-related risks to which the proposed project may be exposed. These due diligence processes enable the early evaluation of any operational and business risks associated with the proposed project. They are followed by further analysis and stakeholder engagement exercises to mitigate the risks where appropriate.
The EIA is a crucial step in ensuring all relevant environmental impacts (such as impacts on air quality, water quality and biodiversity) have been properly considered and, where applicable, addressed by effective mitigation measures. CLP has processes in place to fulfil the EIA requirements and recommendations stipulated by local regulators and follows these same requirements in countries where regulations are not as stringent.
Read about how environmental matters are considered in new projectsOver the years, CLP has diligently managed its environmental impacts in line with international best practices. For example, under the HSEMS, all power generation assets of which CLP has operational or joint operational control are required to achieve third-party certification to international ISO 14001:2015 Environmental Management Systems standard within two years from the commencement of operation or acquisition. In 2024, all assets in this category had successfully certified their EMS to the ISO 14001: 2015 standard.
CLP deploys digital technology for environmental data management to ensure data integrity and to measure progress against targets, as well as to facilitate follow-up actions for each asset. Currently, the existing Group Operations Information System (GOIS) is being used to report asset-level and group-level environmental key performance indicators (KPIs). This will soon be replaced with a new digital system, which will enhance the level of automation and digitalisation of the collection and reporting of corporate data. In addition, CLP has been implementing customised environmental data management systems, called "EMIS" in Hong Kong and "MonitorPro" in Australia. These tools are designed to safeguard environmental data, automate trend analysis and data reporting and support compliance and risk management.
To further enhance the digitalisation of greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting, in 2024, CLP also adopted a new digital platform designed to measure, track and manage GHG emissions and environmental impacts after historical data migration and configuration. This platform is streamlining data collection, analysis and reporting to achieve greater transparency and improved data governance.
For details of how these environmental management tools and processes are being applied to specific environmental areas, please refer to the Biodiversity and ecosystem, Air emissions, Waste management and material use and Water sections.
Copy linkCopied link
CLP plays an active role in nature preservation and habitat restoration activities while seeking to mitigate its impacts on nature, including biodiversity and ecosystem services in the vicinity of its operations, contributing to “no net loss of biodiversity”. CLP's efforts are based on regulatory biodiversity controls, but it also implements site-specific initiatives and initiates ecological compensation programmes where necessary.
In 2024, the EDD process was updated to incorporate more nature-related elements, which included the adoption of IBAT (Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool) for identifying biodiversity sensitive areas. IBAT contains a database of global biodiversity-sensitive areas and threatened species, and is used during the pre-investment stage to avoid biodiversity risks. This tool enables CLP to identify potential biodiversity risks early, allowing for due diligence and early evaluation of operational and business risks. Further analysis and stakeholder engagement exercises follow to mitigate these risks if appropriate.
The CLP Biodiversity Impact Assessment Guideline applies to power generation, transmission and distribution, mines and other power-related projects. It provides a framework for systematically assessing biodiversity impacts and managing biodiversity risks. For example, the Guideline helps CLP flag new operations that could affect the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species and the relevant country’s national conservation list of threatened species well ahead of any investment decision. The Guideline is currently being updated to include considerations from sectoral guidelines issued by the TNFD.
The biodiversity impact assessment also observes local legislative requirements and references the International Finance Corporation Sustainability Framework. It involves describing the baseline conditions, evaluating the magnitude and significance of project impacts and investigating options for mitigation. The assessment only contemplates offsets after considering options for avoidance, minimisation and restoration or rehabilitation.
Mitigation measures will be developed based on the findings and on recommendations from the EDD and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) exercises, to address adverse impacts related to nature, biodiversity and ecosystems.
At the project operation stage, all identified adverse impacts will be monitored and controlled under the EMS. The EMS is also continuously reviewed to incorporate emerging environmental matters, such as nature, into existing management processes. In 2024, CLP Power’s Generation Business Unit updated its significant environmental aspect registers for operation and maintenance activities to include nature-related impact drivers and dependences, along with associated mitigation measures.
Biodiversity and nature-related enhancement programmes in 2024 included:
Copy linkCopied link
CLP is striving to reduce the air pollutants emitted from its operations while expanding its renewable and nuclear energy portfolio. Achieving further emission reductions from existing fossil fuel power stations remains a high priority.
According to the CLP Group HSEMS, the coal-fired and gas-fired power plants under CLP's operational control must adhere to CLP’s prescribed limits on SO2, NOx and total PM, or they must fully comply with local regulations, whichever is more stringent. These emissions are monitored by continuous emissions monitoring systems. Aware of the increasing focus on mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants, CLP has also been monitoring and reporting mercury quantities from its coal-fired power plants since 2021.
In addition to incorporating state-of-the-art air emissions control technologies and mitigation measures into its plant management, CLP has also designed new gas-fired power stations with advanced generation technologies. These new technologies enhance electricity generation efficiency, and are contributing to the further reduction in air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions.
Coal-fired power plants, such as Yallourn, Mount Piper and Castle Peak Power Stations, are the main contributors to the Group's air emissions and the emissions metrics are largely influenced by these plants’ performance. CLP uses a combination of a managed fuel mix and advanced technologies to limit its air emissions.
CLP had set Group-wide medium- and long-term emissions targets for the years 2025 and 2030 to guide further improvements in reducing air emissions of NOx, SO2 and PM. The emission targets scope covers all power plants under its operational control.
The 2024 results related to the emission targets and progress are presented in the following table:
Nature metrics | Pollution Reduction | 2024 Results | 2024 Progress | Target Range | Target |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emissions (Impact driver) | NOx emissions | -26% | In line | -20% to -30% | -50% |
SO2 emissions | -18% | In line | -15% to -20% | -55% | |
PM emissions | -16% | In line | -10% to -15% | -90% |
In 2024, CLP cut emissions of NOx, SO2 and PM by 26%, 18% and 16% respectively compared with the baseline year of 2021, in line with its emission targets and is slightly ahead of the PM emissions target set for 2025.
Following the divestment of a majority stake in the Fangchenggeng coal-fired Power Station in Mainland China, and excluding assets in India, particularly the coal-fired Jhajjar Power Station, overall emissions were significantly reduced. By implementing a strategy of fuel diversification and consistently maintaining the effectiveness of emission control facilities, emissions can be further reduced.
Key initiatives and programmes in 2024 included:
NOx and SO2 emissions increased slightly in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily due to increased generation at Mount Piper Power Station to meet power demand. Particulate matter (PM) emissions decreased slightly due to improved management of PM emission control facilities, supported by the newly installed PM Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (PM-CEMS) at Mount Piper Power Station.
Copy linkCopied link
CLP is striving to integrate circular economy (CE) principles across its project lifecycles and explore opportunities for minimising materials use and waste disposal. In addition to following a waste management hierarchy (i.e. prevent, reduce, reuse, replace, recycle, treat and dispose) which prioritises preferred actions for minimising waste generation in its daily operations, CLP has continued to promote the implementation of CE concepts in its operations to address waste and pollution matters.
Through the EDD and EIA during the project design and construction stage and the EMS during the operation stage, all hazardous and non-hazardous waste is managed appropriately and in accordance with local regulations. Following the waste reduction hierarchy, CLP prioritises waste reduction and then reuse and recycling rather than disposal. CLP also encourages the adoption of CE principles throughout the project cycle, from design to end-of-life. If hazardous waste has to be collected for recycling or disposal, it is handled by licensed contractors in accordance with local regulatory requirements.
The main operational by-products of CLP’s coal-fired power stations are coal ash from coal combustion and gypsum from the flue gas desulphurisation process. CLP actively manages these by-products according to the waste management processes and procedures outlined in the EMS. Rather than disposing of them, CLP endeavours to reuse them for construction and other applications in line with circular economy principles and in accordance with local regulations and practices.
While CLP’s regular operations produce relatively small amounts of solid and liquid waste, projects involving demolition and construction usually increase the generation of non-hazardous solid waste. These waste streams are addressed and monitored under the EMS, and incorporate CE concepts to minimise waste and pollution. CLP also collaborates with its suppliers in identifying recovery and recycling opportunities, and works to drive behavioural changes among its own employees. This includes setting up recycling facilities at power stations and office premises, and providing e-learning courses on circular economy principles and waste management.
CLP monitors waste generation on a monthly basis by tracking the solid and liquid forms of hazardous and non-hazardous waste produced and recycled at its facilities.
Reviews of all the ash impoundments at CLP-owned plants (i.e. the various ash lagoons at Castle Peak Power Station in Hong Kong and Yallourn Power Station in Australia) have identified them as having low hazard potential and satisfactory structural integrity.
CLP has implemented various measures and initiatives to reduce waste and increase reuse and recycling during electricity generation and other operations.
It recycles its hazardous and non-hazardous solid and liquid waste where feasible and sells by-products such as ash and gypsum for reuse in other industries.
Different assets generate varying types of waste. Fossil fuel plants are the main contributors of waste generated. The amount of waste produced and recycled is not directly related to the amount of electricity sent out, but can be affected by maintenance and construction activities as well as local waste facilities and treatment practices.
CLP set Group-wide medium- and long-term waste targets for the years 2025 and 2030 in terms of a percentage reduction of total waste produced, including by-products produced by the coal-fired power plants, against the base year of 2021. In addition, waste targets for the year 2025 of 100% were set for the recycling of Waste Electrical & Electronic Equipment (WEEE), scrap rechargeable batteries, scrap metals and inert construction waste and for the removal of single-use plastics in catering facilities.
In 2024, total waste products from the Group’s operations were reduced by 68% compared with the target-setting baseline year of 2021, slightly ahead of the waste target set for 2025.
The decrease was mainly contributed by the divestment of a majority stake in Fangchenggeng coal-fired power station in Mainland China, the exclusion of India's assets, particularly the coal-fired Jhajjar Power Station, and various waste management initiatives at certain assets.
Coal ash from coal combustion and gypsum from the flue gas desulphurisation process remain CLP's main waste products.
All Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE), scrap rechargeable batteries, scrap metal and inert construction waste were fully recycled in 2024 and single-use plastics in catering facilities were also removed in 2024, based on local regulatory policies and infrastructure available for recycling. Looking ahead, CLP will continue to refine the waste management process and promote the implementation of CE principles as well as explore CE improvement opportunities throughout the project cycle.
The waste target scope covers all operating assets under CLP’s operational control. The 2024 results relating to the waste targets and their progress are shown in the following table:
Nature metrics | Pollution Reduction | 2024 Results | 2024 Progress | Target | Target |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Waste (Impact driver) | Waste products1 | -68% | In line | -65% | -70% |
Recycling of Waste Electrical & Electronic Equipment (WEEE) | 100% | In line | 100% | -- | |
Recycling of rechargeable batteries | 100% | In line | 100% | -- | |
Recycling of scrap metal | 100% | In line | 100% | -- | |
Recycling of inert construction waste | 100% | In line | 100% | -- | |
Removal of single-use plastics in catering facilities | 100% | In line | 100% | -- |
Key programmes and initiatives in 2024 included:
The total amount of ash and gypsum by-products recycled or sold in 2024 decreased compared to 2023. This decrease was due to reduced generation from the coal-fired Castle Peak Power Station, and some gypsum remained in site storage, pending sale for recycling.
The total amount of hazardous waste produced in 2024 decreased compared to 2023, mainly due to a remediation project at Yallourn Power Station in 2023. The recycling amounts between 2023 and 2024 remained comparable.
The total amount of non-hazardous waste produced and recycled in 2024 decreased compared to 2023, primarily due to reduced waste from Hong Kong's transmission and distribution operations.
Copy linkCopied link
Recognising the importance of addressing water matters, CLP has been strengthening its water management practices to reduce water usage and wastewater discharge, for example, by employing seawater cooling or water recirculation processes in its generation plants.
CLP is working to reduce the amount of fresh water it uses for its operations, and to minimise the impact of new energy projects on water systems. CLP’s power stations carry out a range of water conservation initiatives depending on their site conditions, operational situation and age. The amount of water which can be recycled also depends on factors such as location, power station design and local regulatory requirements.
There are two major water concerns that affect CLP. One is that water use in its power plants may impact local water quality and contribute to local water scarcity. To address this, EIAs are carried out at the planning stage of new projects, in accordance with local requirements, to ensure that any water use impacts associated with project construction and plant operation are managed and mitigated to an acceptable level.
The second concern is water security at CLP’s fossil fuel and hydropower generation assets. Four of CLP's six fossil fuel plants under operational control use seawater for cooling. Where seawater cooling is not feasible, CLP strives to minimise its use of freshwater and instead adopt water recirculation processes. Solar farms also use water for the cleaning of solar panels, but the amount required is comparatively small. These measures help limit the risks caused by water security issues.
CLP assesses water risks associated with its new projects through systematic environmental due diligence and using globally recognised tools such as WRI Aqueduct. Its assessments cover parameters such as water availability, water sensitivity, water stress mapping, potential competing use with other stakeholders and the management strategies in each region. Where a water supply risk is identified, the Company engages with local stakeholders to understand their needs and with local water suppliers to mitigate or resolve the issue. The latest assessments across the Group indicate that its current water supply regimes are stable and the overall risk of substantial impact is minimal.
The quality of CLP’s water discharges must also meet licensing and regulatory standards. Under CLP’s EMS, the adverse impacts of water discharges are identified, monitored and controlled under programmes which are reviewed on a regular basis. Specific emergency response plans have also been developed to prevent and address the spillage or leakage of pollutants. As a result of the wastewater treatment processes put in place, none of CLP's operations had any material impact on the water bodies associated with them.
To monitor its water-use efficiency, CLP tracks its freshwater withdrawal, discharge and intensity (based on electricity sent out). Internal targets are set each year to encourage continuous improvement in water management practices. CLP also participates in the CDP water security questionnaire. By sharing water resource management data through the survey, CLP is able to benchmark its practices against industry peers.
In 2023, CLP reviewed its environmental target-setting process and refined its water targets to reflect the upcoming retirement of CLP’s fossil fuel plants. CLP has set Group-wide medium- and long-term freshwater consumption targets for the years 2025 and 2030 in terms of a percentage reduction of freshwater consumption quantities against the base year of 2021. It has set an ambitious freshwater consumption target comprising an absolute reduction of 45% to 55% by 2025, and a reduction of 85% by 2030, using 2021 as the baseline. The freshwater consumption target covers all CLP’s operationally controlled assets.
The 2024 results against the Group-wide medium- and long-term freshwater consumption targets are shown in the following table:
Nature metrics | Pollution Reduction | 2024 Results | 2024 Progress | Target Range by end 2025 | Target by end 2030 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Water (Dependencies) | Freshwater consumption | -51% | In line | -45 to -55% | -85% |
Against the group-wide targets in compared with the baseline year of 2021, CLP reduced the freshwater consumption by 51% in 2024 which was in line with the freshwater consumption target.
The decrease was mainly contributed by the divestment of a majority stake in Fangchenggeng coal-fired Power Station in Mainland China, the exclusion of India’s assets, particularly the coal-fired Jhajjar Power Station and various water conservation initiatives at certain assets.
CLP will continue to track the volume of water recycling in its power stations for continual improvement and share good practices across the Group to maximise the benefit of individual power stations' efforts.
Examples of CLP’s water management are summarised below:
Freshwater consumption increased in 2024 compared to 2023, mainly due to reduced rainfall at the Yallourn coal mine. Freshwater consumption in water-stressed areas increased in 2024 after five EnergyAustralia fossil fuel plants, including the coal-fired Yallourn and Mount Piper Power Stations in Australia, were identified as being in water-stressed areas year-round by updated WRI Aqueduct modeling.